Summary of Modern Japanese History: The Taisho Era
(Inaugural issue of the magazine Bluestockings (Seitō), 1911; Wiki Commons)
The Taisho Period from 1912 to 1926 was a time of increased urbanization and internationalization for Japan. By this time, Tokyo had become a completely modern city and was the center of political and cultural life. Moreover, these as well as economic changes resulted in an emerging and empowered middle class which soon began to issue calls for more basic rights and freedoms. Their efforts were fostered by increased rates of education and literacy, along with a boom in published materials and media including newspapers. One issue at the forefront of this was the quest for women’s rights and the women’s suffrage movement. First-wave feminists such as Hiratsuka Raicho wrote about women’s issues in her magazine Seitō (Bluestockings) and published the works of other prominent women writers such as Yosano Akiko. In 1911, Yosano penned her famous poem, “The Day the Mountains Move”, in the same magazine. The work captured the awakened political consciousness of women around the country.
The day the mountains move has come.
I speak, but no one believes me.
For a time the mountains have been
asleep,
But long ago, they danced with fire.
It doesn’t matter if you believe
this,
My friends, as long as you believe:
All the sleeping women
Are now awake and moving (ctd. in
Rasplica Rodd 1991: 180)
Throughout Meiji and Taisho, the Japanese
government attempted to redefine the role of women in society. They found their
ideal in the concept of ryōsai kenbo,
which meant “good wife, wise mother.” This explicitly placed women in the home
sphere, as the bearer/rearer of children, and as subservient to the husband
(i.e. good wife). The concept also notably deprived women of their sexual roles
as a woman, i.e. control over their sexuality. At the same time, the government
actively worked to keep women out of the public sphere and specially to prevent
them from engaging in politics. This was enforced through a series of laws from
the late 1880s aimed to create the ideal “a-political” woman (Uno 1993; Garon
1997). Indeed, Meiji leaders’ disparagement of “dirty” politics seemingly had
no bounds, and the majority of the average populace was discouraged from
participating in the political realm.
However, government and male control over
female sexuality and sexual mores did not go unchallenged. One form of social
and cultural resistance was the idea of a “modern girl” (moga) who displayed certain affinities for food, drink, music,
dress, and lifestyle (namely Western in origin) and flaunted her liberation
from the home sphere. Other government controls were also challenged. Meiji
leaders tended to maintain the view, prominent since at least the Kamakura
Period, that state-regulated/sponsored prostitution was necessary to control
male desires and thus protect the family (ie)
system. Thus, throughout Taisho and early Shōwa, the government continued to
maintain regulated prostitution in areas such as Tokyo’s Yoshiwara district (See Garon 1997 for more on this).
Yet emerging female control over their own sexuality, resulted in some
rejecting this model. Café culture, where young female waitresses chose whether
to sell sexual services to their customers, emerged as one alternative.
(Tipsy by Kobayakawa Kiyoshi; Wiki Commons)
The government viewed women’s
liberation, the moga, and especially
the café waitresses as an extreme social ill in need of correction. Although a
portion of the male population was granted the right to vote in 1925, the
women’s suffrage movement was ultimately unsuccessful in achieving its goals.
Moreover, the government passed laws banning birth control in 1938, a clear
attempt to limit women’s roles to the home sphere and child rearing. Meanwhile,
the government and big business leaders adroitly manipulated women as a cheap
source of labor.
Economic difficulties were
not limited to women, but were symptomatic of the 1910s and 1920s in Japan.
Furthermore, growing economic inequality was worsened by a series of disasters
including an economic downturn after World War One, the Great Kanto Earthquake in
1923, and the Great Depression (sekai
kyōkō) in 1929. It was the lowest classes in society at the time, the
workers and the farmers especially, who were forced to bear the brunt of these
disasters and growing economic inequality and disparity. At the same time, the
Russian Revolution in 1917 and the emergence of communism as a viable
alternative to a capitalist system which seemed increasingly brutal and
exploitative aided the growth of socialist thought in Japan. Such ways of
approaching labor and basic human rights had already found earlier precedent in
the Freedom and Popular Rights Movement (jiyū
minken undo) of the 1880s, the activism of Tanaka Shōzō who defended the
pollution victims of the Ashio Copper Mine, and the writings of Saikai
Toshihiko and Kōtoku Shūsui who formed the Heimin
Shimbun (The Commoner’s News).
As a result, the working and
lower classes were less inclined to take exploitation sitting down. Proletariat
literature under notable writers such as Kobayashi Takiji and Tokunaga Sunao
witnessed an explosion in popularity against a background of growing protest
and unrest including the Rice Riots of 1918.
(Image of a pro-worker's-struggle poster; MIT Visualizing Cultures)
Nothing scared the elites in
power, however, more than the emergence of left-wing thought, and they cringed
at the idea of granting the lower classes – many of whom they still viewed as a
lesser form of human being – basic human rights, let alone a say in politics
and control over the course of the nation. Thus, through a series of carrot and
stick policies it attempted to curb the populace’s flirtation with democratic
and Socialist ideals. On the one hand, it used high profile incidents such as
the High Treason Incident of 1910-11 (taigyaku
jiken), a purported attempt on the Meiji Emperor’s life, as a pretext to
crackdown on prominent leftists including Kōtoku Shūsui. Police arrested
twenty-five individuals in “connection” with the case and tried them in a closed
courtroom. Eventually, eleven of them, including Kōtoku were executed. This
heightened a culture of repression against so-called "thought criminals."
A similar instance occurred after the 1923 Kanto Earthquake. In the chaos that
followed the quake, police again arrested supposed leftists while some resident
vigilantes led a rampage against the local Korean population, massacring
thousands.
On the other hand, the
government attempted to pacify the calls for basic human rights on all fronts
by granting a semblance of freedom: “universal” male suffrage in 1925. Although
this raised the number of eligible voters to about twelve million, this still
only amounted to one-fifth of the population. Moreover, it came with a number
of restrictions, and it denied the right to vote to anyone who had declared
bankruptcy, was receiving government aid, or who lacked a permanent place of
residence. In essence, it explicitly kept the poorest in society
disenfranchised from the voting process.
- See a draft of the Universal Male
Sufferage Law of 1925 here http://aboutjapan.japansociety.org/content.cfm/universal_male_suffrage_law_of_1925
However, the government truly
revealed its hand when it enacted the Peace Preservation Law (Chian iji-hō) the same year. This made
it a crime to challenge the kokutai
(essentially the emperor system) as well as the idea of private property – both
things which many leftists, especially Communists and Socialists, aimed to
change. Moreover, the vagueness of the term kokutai
and of the law itself, made it possible for the thought police to arrest
and punish nearly anyone whom they even suspected may be a so-called
“thought-criminal.” In this atmosphere, police were able to arrest 1,600
suspected leftists and communists on March 15, 1928.
- See the Peace Preservation Law of
1925 here http://www.colorado.edu/cas/tea/becoming-modern/3-nature/Nature-of-Sovereignty-handout3B.pdf
Peace Preservation Law
Questions:
- Who or which groups would this law
specifically target? Why do you think this?
- Why is there mention of private
property in this law? What does this refer to?
- What is the significance of Article
Six? How do you think Article Six might actually have been carried out?
- How do you think this law may have
been implemented?
- What do you notice about this law
that may have made it particularly insidious or aggressive?
The brutal suppression of
left-wing thought in this period coincided with the ongoing project of empire
building that Japanese elites had been pursuing since Meiji, and which they saw
as a fundamental part of the nation’s “modernization” process. Initially,
Japan’s colonial expansion continued alongside a period of brief
internationalization in the diplomatic realm. Namely, the country joined the
League of Nations in 1920 and signed the Washington Naval Treaty in 1922. In
the broad sense, both of these were aimed at limiting future potential warfare.
At the same time, Japan’s empire continued to expand and eventually included
Taiwan (1895), Karafuto (1905), areas in Manchuria known as the Kwantung Leased
Territory (1905-6), Korea (protectorate, 1910), and German possessions in China
and the South Pacific (1915). In 1915, Japan also issued the infamous
Twenty-one Demands to China, in which leaders attempted to negotiate and
solidify Japanese economic dominance in the region. Then, between 1918 and
1922, Japan participated in a multi-national punitive expedition against
Russian communism known as the Siberian Intervention.